Unlocking the Secrets of Mercer County Conservatives--An Attempt to Clear the Air

Written by Roberta Biros

My husband has always been interested in politics. I met him in 1987. I was a DJ at a local bar . . . he was a cook. The first night we met we had a huge argument. He (my then 'future husband') must have found my temper to be interesting, as on the second night he came back for more. We eventually became friends. A month later we started dating. On our first date, I asked what sort of plans he had for the future. He explained that he was attending the University of Pittsburgh and he was majoring in Political Science. I asked, “with a degree in Political Science, what sort of career do you pursue?” His answer was “with a degree in Political Science I’m qualified to feed the pigeons on Sundays”.

I was never very interested in politics, but through constant references to it, my husband made me interested. We have both been interested in politics and political debate together since the early 1990’s. We first became active politically when we supported the candidacy of Ross Perot. We felt that George H.W. Bush had to go, and we liked the fresh ideas that Perot brought to the table.

Since that time, we’ve been involved in political debate with family and friends through many election cycles. I’ve been involved by working polls and going door-to-door for candidates off and on since the mid 1990s. When we moved to Mercer County in January of 2006, we did not immediately catch on or dive into local politics.

The first politician that we met was Senator Bob Robbins. We attended an annual dinner for the Chamber of Commerce, and Senator Robbins showed up unexpectedly. He didn’t have a reserved seat at the head table, and he came to our table and asked to sit with us. We didn’t know who he was until he introduced himself. The dinner was quite enjoyable and we thoroughly enjoyed the conversation. A few months later we picked up a ROBBINS bumper sticker at Fredonia Old Home Week and displayed it proudly on our vehicle through the 2006 General Election. I knew nothing about Senator Robbins other than what we discussed with him at dinner that night. We had not yet tuned in to local news through the Herald, and we knew nothing about the political issues of Mercer County or its political leaders.

We didn’t become involved in politics again until the Presidential Election of 2008. Yes, I was a Republican and I supported the ticket of John McCain and Sarah Palin. I never liked McCain much, but I was relieved to see Palin, a conservative female candidate, take on the Good Ol’ Boys club of the GOP. I supported their ticket for that reason. I displayed their sign in my yard.

The yard sign eventually attracted other conservatives. I built political friendships with neighbors and passersby. I also made numerous attempts to get involved more deeply through activities with the Mercer GOP. One day my yard sign attracted a Mercer County political candidate to stop by and offer an introduction. That candidate was State Representative Michele Brooks. We talked briefly and she dropped off campaign materials. After a brief discussion I realized that I liked her message. I offered to display her yard sign if she would like to supply one. I thought nothing more of the conversation.

About a week or two later, on a Saturday morning, a visitor pulled into our driveway. It was Michele Brooks (and her assistant) personally delivering a yard sign. I was stunned. A politician that actually did what they said they would do. It was refreshing. I began to do some research regarding Representative Brooks. I researched her voting record (which I agreed with), and I researched what other people had to say about her. I eventually found articles from The Herald, letters to the editor, and blog posts written about her. There were lots of rotten things written, but none of them seemed to be substantiated with facts. Her record and the nasty statements didn’t jive according to my research and I found it aggrevating.

I began writing this blog, Mercer County Conservatives, on October 19, 2008. I wrote my first blog post in reaction to a blog written by another area writer. His post was published HERE. My response to that blog was published HERE.

That is my story. Period.

From that point forward, I decided to write in an effort to share REAL information with Mercer County citizens. I would publish opinions, but I would provide details and facts to back up my opinions. I wanted to present INFORMATION, provide comments, and spark conversation on the topics. My blog was extremely popular, and the traffic grew exponentially.

There have been many reactions to my posts. Some people have been angry for the things that I’ve written. Although I am not responsible for the actions that prompted the blog posts, the individuals are angry because they “got caught” doing something that was somehow inappropriate. I’ve been attacked by many because I have been the “messenger”. Others have accepted my comments and used the comments to better themselves and their positions on issues. All along, however, MY GOAL has been to report and punish bad decisions, and to promote and reward good behavior. MY GOAL has been GOOD GOVERNMENT. Many have seen and understood that goal . . . others have not.

In December of 2008 I extended the publication of my blogs throughout Pennsylvania by joining blogging communities that are designed to share traffic and promote political opinions. My readership grew more.

“Blogging” has always been a HOBBY for me. I’ve criticized the newspaper for giving the impression that blogging is my “career” as it clearly is not. Blogging has cost me a considerable amount of time, effort, and money, but it has never “paid back” in a monetary way. I’ve invested an incredible number of hours in research, writing, and editing, and in return I’ve made many friends through political discussion. I’ve received nothing else in return.

When I decided to run for political office, it was immediately brought up that I was a “blogger” . . . as though it was a dirty word. If you read what I’ve written, however, you’ll see that my criticisms and compliments outline a clear political platform and listing of political beliefs. You may agree or disagree with my comments, but the comments have always clearly been outlined as “my opinions” . . . something that I still have a right to.

Over the past several months I’ve been directly criticized regarding some of my political opinions. I have no problem with the criticisms as I welcome the debate. Unfortunately, I’ve been TOLD by many to REMOVE and DELETE my comments from the on-line community. Let me make myself very clear. I WILL NOT DELETE OR EDIT my opinions due to political pressure from ANYONE.

Now, allow me to address some SPECIFIC issues in an effort to clear the air about me and this blog.

FARM SUBSIDIES

On February 3, 2009, I wrote a blog post regarding Farm Subsidies as they related to Mercer County. The full blog post is published HERE. I was challenged by a fellow blogger from Eastern Pennsylvania to take on the topic. I was happy to do so. I took a long look at the data regarding Farm Subsidies, and I analyzed the extensive list of names of recipients and the amounts that they received. I pulled a list of names that I recognized from MERCER COUNTY POLITICS. I pulled the ONLY FOUR NAMES that I recognized, and I wrote about the money that those four people received through the program.

My post was read statewide, and I received considerable praise for the intelligent way that the data was gathered and organized. Locally, the topic generated considerable interest and conversation. The topic also generated its fair share of complaints. The complaints were regarding the fact that I published the results. It was also said that my research results were skewed in an effort to go after only specific individuals (and to somehow protect others). I’ve always stated that I’d welcome a list of other “Mercer County political names” that I missed, but no such list has ever surfaced. Let us all be honest. The complaints came from individuals on the list because they were ANGRY that they got caught. They have never apologized for actively taking farm subsidy funds, but they have repeated DEMANDED that I remove my comments from the public domain. It sounds like “greedy and corrupt” politicians attempting to protect themselves. What do you think?

Should I apologize?

Exactly what would I apologize for? Should I apologize for the fact that these individuals TOOK farm subsidies? Should I apologize for the fact that some of these individuals CONTINUE to TAKE farm subsidies? Should I apologize because the names that I selected were prominent names from Mercer County politics? My answer to all of these questions is “HELL NO”. If you are looking for an apology for any of these reasons you will not receive it. If you are looking for me to remove this blog post from the public domain, that won’t happen either.

I stand by what I’ve written, and it is now a part of public record. If anyone would like to provide proof that the information that I’ve published is untrue or not factual, I welcome your feedback at roberta.in.mercer@gmail.com.

COCONUT BOB

On January 24, 2009, I wrote a blog post titled “Senator Bob Robbins Pays for Virgin Islands Trip Because He Was Afraid of Getting Caught with His Hands in the Till” [read the full post HERE]. In it I passed along a story that I found in the Philadelphia Inquirer regarding Mercer County’s own Senator Bob Robbins.

The post generated much attention and conversation. The story eventually made its way to The Herald. They wrote a story titled “Sen. Robbins pays for trip to conference in Caribbean” [read the full story HERE].

I responded to The Herald’s story with a follow-up blog titled “Senator Robbins Only Needs to “Network” Where It’s Warm and Sunny” [read the full post HERE].

The conversation continued in The Herald with an opinion piece titled “OUR VIEW: Key legislative conference or just a sunny vacation?” [read the full story HERE].

This entire chain of events was outlined in my blog in summary in a post titled “Coconut-Gate Update: Senator Bob Robbins Still in the Limelight” [read the full post HERE]

So, I took a story that was published in Philadelphia and I made the people of Mercer County aware of it. The story was then picked up by the local papers. The issue was eventually labeled “Coconut-Gate” and Senator Robbins was referred to as “Coconut Bob”. Is any of this my fault? Should I apologize it? If you look at the facts, only ONE (1) person is responsible for “Coconut-Gate”, and that one (1) person was Senator Bob Robbins for having made the ridiculous statements to the press in the first place.

It is unfortunate that the issue made some political enemies. Could those political enemies have come out and apologized for their original comments? Perhaps, but instead, they would prefer to vilify me for pointing out their mistake. It is now TEN (10) MONTHS later and my comments are still being criticized and questioned. I’ve been asked to REMOVE my statements and apologize.

Should I apologize?

Exactly what would I apologize for? Should I apologize for the fact that these statements were made in the first place? Should I apologize for the fact that the individuals involved refused to take responsibility for what they said? Should I apologize because the person that I wrote about was a prominent name in Mercer County politics? My answer to all of these questions is “HELL NO”. If you are looking for an apology for any of these reasons you will not receive it. If you are looking for me to remove this blog post from the public domain, that won’t happen either.

I stand by what I’ve written, and it is now a part of public record. If anyone would like to provide proof that the information that I’ve published is untrue or not factual, I welcome your feedback at roberta.in.mercer@gmail.com.

CLOWNS TO THE LEFT OF ME, JOKERS TO THE RIGHT

I use this reference often. It is funny that I find myself needing to repeat myself, but that seems to be a problem that follows me consistently.

On March 11, 2009, I wrote a post titled “Left, Right, or Down the Middle?” [read the full post HERE] . The post was intended to “clear the air”. It is for that reason that I suggest that you refer to it now, as my thoughts and responses are STILL EXACTLY THE SAME.

The following weekend, I was publicly criticized for the post mentioned above. The criticism came at a meeting of the Democrat Women of Mercer County, and it came specifically from District Attorney Robert Kochems. I did not apologize for my post then, and I do not intend on apologizing for it now.

Just last week the issue was raised again. I was criticized for the post mentioned above as well as the post that I published the following week titled “Public Availability of Personal Income Tax Records for Elected Officials and Candidates in Mercer County” [read the full post HERE]. It has been suggested that this second post was “out of line” as it called out the same District Attorney Kochems for “attacking” me. Mr. Kochems own wife admits that the questions from DA Kochems were that of a “prosecutor”, but my opinion is somehow classified as unfair. Mr. Kochems himself stated that his comments were inappropriate and I was glad to share those comments in my blog post titled “Kochems Was Wrong . . . His Words Not Mine” [read the full blog HERE].

Should I apologize for my blog posts? Should those same blog posts be removed from the public domain?

As you can imagine, my answer to ALL of these questions is “HELL NO”.

DIFFERENT PEOPLE HAVE DIFFERENT REACTIONS

In my blog posts over the past year I’ve taken great time and effort to report GOOD things that elected officials have done, but I have also been critical of BAD things that those same elected officials have been involved in. Some of our political leaders handle the comments like “grown ups”, and others have reacted “childishly”.

My hat goes off to those political figures in Mercer County that have accepted my comments and have made attempts to better themselves because of them. I’ve seen many of the individuals mentioned in my blog posts repeatedly over the past year. Most of them are quite courteous, friendly, and positive. There are only a few that treat me like sewage, but those individuals also seem to be the most vocal. There are times that I get tired of it all, and I’ll admit that today is one of those days. I’m sick and tired of the constant criticisms, and I’m sick and tired of being asked to apologize.

I am who I am. I am a concerned citizen . . . some might call me a political activist. I attempt to inform and educate others about issues of local importance, and I’ve spent many long nights and endless hours devoted to that task. I’ve never asked for anything in return for my efforts, and I expect no credit for my work. I WILL NOT, however, APOLOGIZE for what I have written or REMOVE my writings to satisfy others. If you don’t like what I have to say . . . please don’t read it.

WHERE DO I GO FROM HERE?

Will my blog posts DISAPPEAR from existence? No. Unless one of you finds a way to HAVE ME REMOVED from the public domain.

Will I eventually DISAPPEAR from the political landscape of Mercer County? Maybe, but until that happens I refuse to change who I am or how I think for any individual or any Party platform. I will remain true to myself, and if that means that I have NO political future . . . I'll be fine with that. If people do not want to support me politically because of the things that I have written, I say "fine". If people do agree with my right to my opinion and they want to destroy me politically for it, I say "fine". I do not do "what I do" in an effort to gain acceptance from other people or as a way to gain "political support". If people want to befriend me BECAUSE I am honest in my political opinions, then I welcome them with open arms.

Where do I fit in? At this point, I don’t really know. Very honestly, at this point I don’t really care anymore. I’ve been badgered so heavily from “the left and from the right” that I’m fed up with it all at this point. I’m tired of people trying to tell me what I should do and how I should do it, and (very honestly) I’m tired of defending myself.

I will continue to do “what I do”. Some have called me a “whistle blower”, others have called me “an independent thinker”, and still others simply call me a “pain in the arse”. Either way, I am who I am and I do not intend on changing or stifling my opinions to pacify any group or any individual.

The things that I write are not “personal”. The issues discussed in this blog are intended to be “political”. If you are a political figure that doesn’t like seeing your name in this blog, then why don’t you just DO THE RIGHT THING (and . . . therefore . . . giving me no reason to write about you).



.

Mercer County PA 2010 Political Predictions

What will the political fate be for Con. Kathy Dahlkemper, Sen. Bob Robbins, Rep. Mark Longietti, or Rep. Michele Brooks in 2010?

Written by Roberta Biros

With the 2009 political season comfortably behind us, it’s time to take a look at the political landscape for 2010. There will be plenty written about the “big races” in Pennsylvania like the one to replace Governor Rendell or the one to tackle Senator Specter, but I’d like to focus on the races that will impact good ol’ Mercer County.

This is my first state-wide blog post in a while, so please bear with me as I get back into my comfort zone. While much of what I’m about to convey will anger many, I’m simply stating a series of facts and political opinions based on the information that is currently available as well as a wealth of first hand knowledge that I've gathered from personal experiences. I feel expertly qualified to comment on the political issues of both parties as I've experienced them all "up close and personal". My thoughts are honest and are being offered for the purpose of debate and conversation. I’d welcome friendly on the matter through my personal email at Roberta.in.mercer@gmail.com.

Upon close review of the 2009 general election results in Mercer County, one thing is absolutely clear. When the Mercer County PA GOP gets motivated (in this case for the sake of self preservation) they can be an angry and resourceful little mob. Similarly, when the chips are down, the Mercer County Democrat Party is a ship without a rudder (some might say a ‘sinking ship without a rudder’ but I’ll leave that to the opinion of others). The political climate and outlook for Democrats in Mercer County is poor, but the Mercer GOP still has the same fundamental problems as one year ago . . . self-serving leadership.

Who Will the Players Be?

When determining the possible political confrontations of 2010, it is important to determine “who in their right mind would want to run for public office?” You would think that the political committees, alliances, and clubs in Mercer County would be thankful for candidates that are willing to sacrifice time, money, and energy on a campaign, but that is simply not the case. The Mercer GOP is still only concerned about its long standing “hierarchy”; and the leadership of the Democrat committee is more concerned about the Florida Recounts of 2000, Swift Boat Ads of 2004, and the “infamous Republican flyer” of 2007. Neither party is concerned about building a future for their party. Instead, Republicans and Democrats are concerned about protecting the same old Republicans and Democrats.

My own experiences in running for office were met with threats and personal assaults from the right, and attempts to remove my name from the party slate card from the left. It seems that after I was named the Democrat nominee in the Primary the Democrat Committee leadership made every attempt to have my name removed from the party slate card. This is, of course, according to Commissioner Ken Ammann who claims to have been my ‘knight in shining armor’ as the only defender of my candidacy. The story is an interesting one with a seemingly strange twist, but who am I to argue.

The truth is that the leadership in both parties complain about references to “greed and corruption”, but when their feet are held to the fire those are the only traits that seem to stand out. The voices that are concerned about ‘good government’ and ‘honest public servants’ are drowned out by the Good Ol’ Boys (and Girls) in both parties. Who in their right mind would step into this back biting battle by choice?

I’m not quite sure who all of the players will be in 2010, but I have a pretty good idea on where the interesting races will be and why. Now here comes the fun part . . .

Race #1:
Congresswoman Kathy Dahlkemper vs. an Unnamed Republican

Probable Result: Unnamed Republican will probably win

Why?: The 2009 election proved that the Mercer GOP can be motivated. When you threaten to cut off the head of a snake, the snake doesn’t like it much. In their attempt to protect themselves the Mercer GOP made some interesting friends . . . and perhaps some interesting deals. Leading up to election day, the Mercer GOP received slate cards for distribution throughout Mercer County that were paid for the by PA State GOP (I have a copy in case anyone would like to see one for themselves). It is interesting that a county race would receive assistance from the state level, but remember that the 2009 race for County Treasurer was VERY important to the Mercer GOP (and not so important to the Mercer Democrats). It was a direct threat to the core leadership of the Mercer Republicans and they needed to get support from every available source. I am guessing that the motivation of the Mercer GOP will not stop at the win in the County Treasurer’s race. I would suspect that the Mercer GOP and the current Treasurer (and her friends) have ‘committed’ themselves to assisting the PA State GOP in the next “important battle”. That would be the take back of “Phil English’s” old seat in the 3rd Congressional District. I’m not sure who their candidate will be, but that currently unnamed candidate will probably win handily.

If Democrats fail to show up (like they did in 2009), any Republican candidate will have an easy task in beating Congresswoman Dahlkemper. To make matters worse, short sighted members of the Democrat Executive Committee actively aided the incumbent Republican Mercer County Treasurer to retain her seat and, therefore, bolster the Mercer GOP. Mercer County District Attorney Robert Kochems ( a Democrat) showed his support for the REPUBLICAN incumbent for the Treasurer’s Office with no less than three signs on his business property near downtown Mercer. [as a side note . . . DA Kochems was recently referred to publicly as “a prick” . . . not my words, but the words of his wife Deb Little Kochems at a recent meeting of the Northwest Democrat Alliance . . . I nearly fell off my chair but was glad to see that Ms. Kochems and I finally see eye-to-eye on something] By supporting the Republican incumbent (and secretary and “darling” of the Mercer GOP), District Attorney Kochems directly aided in the future demise of Congresswoman Dahlkemper (his wife’s employer). Rather than the Congresswoman having a ‘friend’ in the County Courthouse (like a fellow “blue dog Democrat”), she will have a pitbull who owes some political payback. Mrs. Richardson owes her old friend, Phil English, as well as her rich friends at the PA State GOP, and she has the people and resources lined up to do it . . . and (ironically enough) the Mercer County Democrat Committee helped her get there. There are many of you that will become angered by these statements, but I challenge anyone in the political arena to correct my facts.

I wonder . . . has State Senator Bob Robbins considered making a move to the much coveted U.S. Congress seat? He may be so pumped up after the 2009 election results that he ‘thinks’ that he has the political clout to win the seat. If so, it would be a blessing for Congresswoman Dahlkemper as Coconut Bob may be the ONLY Republican opponent that she could beat.

[FYI: I’ve read that Republican hopefuls Steve Fisher and Brian Lasher have already stepped up to battle Mrs. Dahlkemper . . . who will be next?]

Race #2:
State Senator Bob Robbins vs. ANY Conservative Republican

Results: ANY Conservative Republican wins by a landslide

Why?: While Republicans managed to rally their troops in the 2009 general election, they may still have a difficult time in re-electing their top henchman, Senator Bob Robbins. Robbins thinks that people forget about his late night pay raise of 2006 or his coconut-gate comments of 2008. The truth is, however, that the people that remember those blemishes the most are Republicans. It is, therefore, my opinion that Senator Robbins would have the hardest time winning his own Primary. While the Mercer GOP proved that they can get out the vote much better in a battle of Democrats vs. Republicans, Senator Robbins might have a hard time convincing members of his own Party to select him over any brave conservative that would be willing to take him on in the Primary. Believe me when I say . . . if such a person exists, they would need to be pretty tough skinned to survive the personal beating that they will take in the process. The GOP leadership will not take the battle sitting down, and they won’t hesitate to use any dirty trick in the book to retain their power. Is there a true Conservative in Mercer County willing to take on Mr. Robbins in his own back yard?

Race #3:
Mark Longietti vs. an unnamed Republican or Independent

Result: Win or Lose, the Unnamed Republican or Independent will do serious “damage”

Why?: Rep. Mark Longietti feels safe and secure in his seat as State Representative representing the Valley. Unfortunately, a quick glance at the results of the 2009 general election should be a frightening wake up call for Mr. Longietti. If he is faced with a Republican or Independent challenger, he could be in for a long and expensive campaign . . . the races in Hermitage and Sharon in 2009 should be proof of that. While he might still manage to retain his seat against a challenger, he will suffer significant damage in the process. The damage may be in the form of “political” damage to his image as an “untouchable”, but it may also be in the form of financial damage. Representative Longietti would be forced, for the first time, to dip into his sizeable bank roll in an effort to keep pace the with Mercer GOP machine in Mercer County. If the GOP manages to motivate their base (and if the Mercer Democrats continue to suppress theirs), Mr. Longietti will be in serious trouble. 2010 might be the time for Republicans (or Independents) to strike while the iron is hot. Rep. Longietti should be on his best behavior, and he had better hope that other races don’t bring out the Republican votes in full force.

Race #4:
Michele Brooks vs. Anyone (Republican, Democrat, or Independent)

Result: Brooks will win, but at a significant cost to all involved

Why?: A handful of Mercer County Democrats want to take down Michele Brooks in the worst way. They will continue to try, but I would guess that they will continue to be unsuccessful. In 2008, the strategy seemed to be to find a candidate . . . any candidate . . . that was willing to take on the “smart enough and charming enough” Michele Brooks. The candidate that was selected was a really nice guy . . . but a weak candidate (at best). Unfortunately for him, he was willing to spend the time and money to try to wear Brooks down on behalf of others. In the past year, a number of individuals have been approached to do the same thing in 2010 (oh yes, present company included). Anyone that takes the bait would be a fool.

While Democrats take great satisfaction in trying to wear Brooks down, they are just playing a game with her and other people’s money. I suspect that the truth may finally come out this year if Brooks’ true nemesis gets up enough guts and backing to run against her. That nemesis would be Commissioner Ken Ammann. Commissioner Ammann can’t stand Michele Brooks for a number of reasons (one being that she was involved with his firing from the position of County’s Chief Clerk in 2005), and his uncontrollable hate will continue to push him until he finally attempts to take her head on.

Mr. Ammann, a Democrat, intends on going after Ms. Brooks in her own arena . . . as a fiscal conservative. While the idea is laughable, Mr. Ammann seriously thinks that he can take down a Republican in the very conservative 17th District with a “D” beside his name. I’m sorry, Ken, but in the current political climate it simply isn’t going to happen. If Mr. Ammenn decides to hold off his attack on Brooks, I’m certain that they will find some sacrificial lamb that is willing to risk their own money on the venture in an effort to do financial damage to Brooks for 2012.

My advice? (although you didn't ask for it)

I dare Ken Ammann to do it . . . and I’ll bet my last cent (and his) that he will lose. To make the situation more interesting, Mr. Ammann will be betting his political future on that one race. As I see it, if he ends up with a big “L” (for loser) beside his name at the end of a nasty battle in 2010, he will be an easy target to be taken down in the 2011 race for County Commissioner.

As far as my advice to other potential targets, I’d run away from this race as fast as my feet would carry me. There are far softer targets to go after in Mercer County, and attempting to tackle Representative Michele Brooks in an effort to settle someone else’s score is a recipe for disaster. I say . . . “save your money” -or- go invest it at a local casino . . . but don't throw it away on this race.

Race #5:
Dick Stevenson vs. no one

Result: Stevenson will win again

Why?: As I said last year, "In 2010, if Dick Stevenson chooses to run for re-election, I suspect that he will have any easy race. He ran unopposed in 2008, and I see this as a possibility again in 2010." Representative Dick Stevenson's seat in the 8th District simply doesn't get much attention in Mercer County, but there is always a possibility of an opponent surfacing from the more prominent Butler County.

In Closing

Well, that's all folks. Those were my official predictions for 2010 politics in Mercer County. Let’s just see how things begin to take shape in the coming weeks as people and politicians (they are two separate things after all) begin to jockey for position.

As always, just my opinion.

Roberta Biros, Mercer County Conservatives

It’s Time for a Little Hard Ball: 2009 Post Election Summaries, Thoughts, and Commentaries

Written by Roberta Biros

According to my web statistics, there are lots of people that are looking for me to post some sort of reaction to the 2009 General Election in Mercer County. As usual, I’ll be glad to provide you with some interesting reading on the topic. I apologize in advance, however, as this blog post is rather long. I've been biting my tongue for a while now, so I found that once I got started I had a great deal to say. Enjoy!

INTRODUCTION

A week ago I had the pleasure (or, perhaps, displeasure) of overhearing a very loud and very obnoxious conversation at a local restaurant. I had just attended the pre-election County Democrat Committee Meeting in Hickory and we decided to stop for a dinner break. It was after 9pm and we were sitting in a not-so-crowded Eat-n-Park enjoying burgers and fries when we overheard a conversation regarding none other than “Roberta Biros”. That’s right . . . we were sitting quietly enjoying our late dinners when I heard a conversation that was transpiring on the opposite end of the restaurant. It was a long, loud, and very descriptive discussion about me and my husband. The conversation included things like “they (referring to my husband and I) are the MOST insincere people I have ever met”. I don’t need to go into all of the rotten things that were said about us, but my favorite statement was “I can’t wait to read her blog on the 4th, 5th, or 6th after she loses and she tries to blame everyone for the loss but herself . . . if she loses there is no one to blame but her”. Much to my shock and dismay, the monolog was coming from the mouth of the Chairman of the Mercer County Democrat Committee, Bob Lark.

Well, Mr. Lark, I’d never want to disappoint you so today I offer you my comments on the 2009 General Election.

GENERAL ELECTION RESULTS

First, let us talk about the results of the 2009 election as they pertain to Mercer County.

County Treasurer:

When I last checked (this afternoon), the unofficial results of the race for County Treasurer were as follows:

ROBERTA BIROS (DEM) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6,049 (31.91% )
GINNY STEESE RICHARDSON (REP). . . . 12,884 (67.96% )

Yes, Mr. Lark, I lost. Who do I blame for my loss? Well, me of course. Why? Because, Mr. Lark, no one else was involved or interested in my campaign BUT me, my husband, and a very small group of family and very good friends. I managed our group and I am, therefore, ultimately responsible for EVERY DECISION that was made during the 2009 election year. I have no one to blame but myself. I lost, and I lost big. My message of good government and good ideas failed to strike a chord, and I was way out played by the incumbent and her band of dedicated ‘friends’. I’ll repeat what I said on Tuesday night after the results were published on-line . . . “I suck”.

Statewide Races:

In Mercer County, in the races for Justice of the Supreme Court, Judge of the Superior Court, and Judge of the Commonwealth Court, REPUBLICANS won overwhelmingly in every single race. It is true that these results were mirrored across much of Pennsylvania, but very notably here in Mercer despite the overwhelming Democrat majority of voters.

Countywide Races (other than Treasurer):

For the office of County Controller, Tom Amundsen WON. He did so, however, ONLY because he had no opponent. A close look at Mr. Amundsen’s numbers (11,868) show that even without an opponent he received fewer votes than Mrs. Richardson in a similar countywide race. If Mr. Amundsen had been faced with a Republican opponent I would venture to guess that he would have lost . . . soundly . . . regardless of who that opponent would have been.

For the office of Jury Commissioner, Maury Keaveny (who is an absolute joy to be around) received fewer votes than his Republican counter-part, Edna Gibson (also a wonderful person).

In summary, the REPUBLICANS swept ALL statewide and countywide races in Mercer County even though the Democrats have an overwhelming lead in registered voters by 7,956 (according to Bob Lark’s records).

WHO IS TO BLAME?

While I take full responsibility for my loss in my race, I wonder who is to blame for the REPUBLICAN SWEEP across the board in Mercer County?

Based on the election results, one could conclude that Republicans showed up to vote in MUCH higher numbers than Democrats (this is a conclusion based on the review of numbers presented on the Mercer County elections site . . . although specific turnout ‘by party’ was not readily available). If one were to point a finger of blame for an apparent under-vote by registered Democrats, who would the finger point to? Would we blame the Republican Party for working long and hard hours to motivate voters through a “get out the vote” phone campaign? Would we blame the Republican Party for pushing to support their entire slate of candidates INCLUDING (and most importantly) their candidate for County Treasurer? Logic would tell us that the Republican Party and its leadership would not be to blame for the overwhelming losses of the Democrat Party. It seems that logic would conclude that the Democrat Party would be responsible for the overwhelming losses by the Democrat Party. That said, only one name is at the top of the list of prominent Democrats who could have done something about the issue. That one name is “Bob Lark, Chairman”.

Are there others that could be blamed? Perhaps. My experience has shown me that speeches by elected officials rallying for a “Democrat Sweep” don’t do much good without efforts to back their words. Representative Mark Longietti, for instance, was quick to wave the Party flag at the annual banquet, but he outright refused my specific request for a letter to assist in my “get out the vote” efforts. My open concerns about a planned suppression of Democrat votes (which was a reported plan that had been in the works since at least early September) were ignored and even criticized. My complaints were treated as though they were a joke. Do people like soon-to-be former Mayor of Greenville, Dick Miller, find humor in my concerns now? Do people like Linda and Bill Judson see any humor in the lack of support that they received from Mercer County Democrat voters? Additionally, to add insult to injury, there were members of the Mercer County Democrat Executive Committee that sent mixed signals by displaying Republican signs at their homes and business properties because they had no interest in supporting the party as a whole. Could these other individuals be partially to blame? It would make for an interesting discussion I suppose, but rather than focusing on the problems within the Democrat party, Bob Lark has been busy at his typewriter for the past month sending me daily correspondence (and in his own words, “nasty letters”). If he had taken some of that time and energy and devoted it to the good of the party, perhaps the results in Mercer County would have been different.

While the 2009 election may be over, the problems still remain. The Democrat Party lacks leadership in Mercer County, and fellow Democrat candidates for the 2010 election season should be very, very concerned. Those of you that think you can simply win re-election without a major effort by the party as a whole may be sorely disappointed next November.

CLOWNS TO THE LEFT OF ME, JOKERS TO THE RIGHT

Back in March I wrote a blog post regarding the problems with politics in Mercer County. I recently re-discovered the post and thought that part of it was worth republishing now as it was sooooooooo spot on. In reference to a meeting of the Democratic Women of Mercer County I had the following comments:

Lesson Number One . . . my musical references in this blog leave a lasting memory. One individual even quoted my “clowns to the left of me, jokers to the right, here I am stuck in the middle with you” reference. Unfortunately, the person that made the reference stopped reading that particular blog post at the end of the musical reference because he didn’t seem to understand the basic reasoning behind the post itself. That’s OK, I still liked the “shout out” (although unintentional).

Lesson Number Two . . . I’ve finally determined the “hot button” issues that seem to bother people of both political parties, and I’ve compiled a simple reference list based on my recent and past experiences.

Republicans get upset (and complain to me) when I blog about . . .
Farm Subsidies, Coconut Gate, Campaign Finances, COLAs, or anything positive regarding Representative Michele Brooks

Democrats get upset (and complain to me) when I blog about . . .
Unions, Obama, Representative Mark Longietti, COLAs, or anything positive regarding Representative Michele Brooks

The third and most important lesson that I learned is regarding universal problem in politics . . . politicians seem to all be tied together regardless of Party. You would think that the Democratic Party would be glad to have someone willing to step up and run for office . . . to fill a much needed void that has gone unaddressed in the race for County Treasurer for 16 years. That is what you would “think”. Unfortunately, it seems that some of the leadership in the Democratic Party are perfectly content with things just the way they are, and they don't appreciate anyone shaking things up.

At first I found this to be confusing, but I think I finally understand the odd foundation on which the behavior is based. It seems that many of our elected officials at the County level all travel within the same tight little circles. The members of the “circles” have a need to protect each other in order to protect themselves. Democratic insiders, Republican insiders, and insiders that have switched between parties are all looking out for each other. Very clear alliances exist, and people from outside of the “circles” are actively beaten back with a stick. The standard tactics are to attempt to belittle and intimidate in order to make outsiders feel that their quest is both ridiculous and impossible. The last thing that any of them want is for a concerned citizen to enter into “their arena” with the sole purpose of making things better and serving the public needs. Why? Because it would make them all look bad.

FIND OUT WHO YOUR FRIENDS ARE

As a quick note, I've been in touch will ALL of my friends and family over the past three days. Many months ago I wrote a blog post with a musical reference to the song by Tracy Lawrence titled “Find Out Who Your Friends Are”. I'd like to make a similar reference now. The events of this week have made it super simple for me to find out who my friends are. First, I just had to look around the room on Tuesday Night as the people who really cared about me and my family were here at my home office to watch the results with us as a team. Those that couldn’t be with us on Tuesday night contacted me by email and phone on Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday, and Today. I know EXACTLY who my friends are as they have all been right here with me either physically or via email and phone.

Mrs. Richardson was the winner on Tuesday night. She is also clear about who her friends are as she published a photo of them all from her election night party. It was good to see that she was surrounded by her friends like the Robbins, the Brooks, and the Lechners. I have to give credit to the Republican Party of Mercer County for getting out the vote and pulling together for a complete Republican sweep. [CLICK HERE to view their celebration photo in case you missed it.]

For those of you that worked so hard for me during the campaign and on Election Day, and to those of you that have been so supportive and such good friends, I THANK GOD FOR YOU!

SO, WHERE DO I GO FROM HERE?

I’ve been asked numerous times this week what I plan on doing now as we move forward. I’ll admit that the past few days have been spent trying to tie up loose ends (like attempting to pick up hundreds of signs from across the county), and I’m really just trying to catch my breath. I’m trying to sort through emotions that I’ve never experienced before and I’ve been working to wrap my head around everything.

I have a level of disappointment right now that is unmatched. Simple ideas that I’ve always lived by like “you can conquer anything with hard work and determination” have been proved to be untrue. Encouraging sayings like “Bad Things Happen When Good People Do Nothing” seem all twisted and stupid. The truth is “Bad Things Happen When Good People Try To Do Something”. My desire to be a public servant and to work for the people of the area to make things better have been squashed by a bunch of self-serving politicians who are more concerned about “winning” than serving the people.

Am I sour? I can say with all honesty that I am disappointed and discouraged. Does my journey end here? Hmmmm. Now that question is a little more difficult to answer. For the short term I will continue to do what I’ve been doing for quite some time now . . . reporting issues of political importance through this forum. I will be writing about things like Farm Subsidies, Woodland Place, self-serving legislators, inappropriate and politically biased behavior from public officials, and anything else that I find to be disturbing. I will give credit where credit is due, but I will not go easy on ANYONE. I have NO political or personal biases now as I’ve found that I have NO friends in the political arena. I will, therefore, be providing a clear and unbiased view of Mercer County politics. My perspective as a fiscal conservative Democrat will help me to sniff out rotten policies and politicians on both sides of the fence.

Welcome to “Mercer County Conservatives Version 2.0”!


.

Election Day 2009: Come to Our “After Party”

Written by Roberta Biros

Today is the day. Today is November 3, 2009. Today is Election Day 2009.

I’ve devoted almost all of this year (2009) to my campaign for Mercer County Treasurer, and I’m relieved that this day is finally here. I’m looking forward to working the polls with my friends and family today, and I have my eyes set on 8pm when the polls close.

I’ve done everything that I could possibly do to argue my case for “being hired” by the people of Mercer County, and it is now Mercer County’s chance to decide who will hold the office of County Treasurer for the next four years. I’m pleased with the decisions that I’ve made . . . and if I had it to do all over again I wouldn’t change a thing.

The "After Party"

For anyone that is interested in watching the election results roll in, please feel free to join us at our home office at 1735 Mercer Road in Delaware Township (on Rt. 58 between Mercer and Greenville) for an “After Party”. We will have food, beverages, and friendship available for anyone that wants to share in the excitement while we watch the ballot counts as they are posted through the County website and on TV. Doors will open at 8pm and we’ll be here until a winner is determined.

Just head on down (or up) Rt. 58 and look for the infamous BIROS billboard. All friends and supporters along with their families are welcome to attend. Even if you can only stop by to say “Hi”, we’d love to see you.



.

Yard Sign 101: A Humorous Update

Written by Roberta Biros

After publishing my blog post last week titled “Yard Sign 101”, I received photos from friends of some additional yard sign examples that should be included in my list of political yard sign lessons. Here are two.

Lesson #1: If you have to ask yourself “should I use duct tape to make this yard sign usable”, the answer should always be NO. (illustrated in the photo below).


Lesson #2: The purpose of a political yard sign is for people to see them. It usually helps if the signs are upright in order for this to occur. (illustrated in the photo below which was taken from a moving car)


Please keep the examples and photos coming. It is providing me with some much needed comic relief!

As always, just my opinion.

.

Yard Sign 101

Written by Roberta Biros

Yard Signs are part of politics. Some would say that they are an important part of running for office, and others would say that their actual impact on a political race is negligible. We can all agree, however, that political yard signs can offer some amusement.

First, I’m constantly amused when yard signs are clustered together on highways and intersections. It is impossible to read any of the signs as your eyes are confused by the insanity of it all. For that reason, we make every attempt to keep “BIROS for Mercer County Treasurer” signs separate and unique (much like the candidate that they represent).

Second, I find it equally humorous to see yard signs stuck in the weeds and in ditches because the people placing them couldn’t find actual “yards” to put the signs in. I prefer to have signs placed in nicely trimmed and cared for yards, but I seem to be in the minority in that preference.

Third, there is a right way and a wrong way to install a yard sign. The photos below provide a few examples. The first sign is installed on a properly fitted frame and the sign is inserted squarely into the ground for a clean and fresh appearance. The second sign is mounted on a wire frame that is several inches too big so that the sign has no chance of hanging properly. I’ve seen this technique used on many signs that are posted around Mercer County this year. In some cases attempts were made to fasten the ill-fitting sign to the frame with string or duct tape which was especially entertaining to see.

ABOVE: GOOD SIGN

BELOW: NOT-SO-GOOD SIGN

The most interesting part of political yard signs is who puts up signs for whom. A perfect example is illustrated in the photo below.

The political sign has been displayed in a property that is currently for sale. According to the public records of the Recorder of Deeds, the property is owned by Mercer County District Attorney Robert Kochems . . . a Democrat (and a member of the Mercer County Democrat Executive Committee). The sign is (interestingly enough) in support of the Republican candidate for the stated office. If I recall, District Attorney Kochems found himself in a bit of a pickle earlier this year when he confused his “political” hat with his “District Attorney” hat. At that time he explained that it is, perhaps, inappropriate for a person in his position to be overly political, but it seems that he no longer cares to separate the appropriate and inappropriate. I suppose if you asked the District Attorney which “hat” he is wearing now, he’d have to admit that he is wearing his “Republican Hat”.

Since this political season is nearing its end, we can all look forward to the menagerie of signs soon disappearing . . . but the next election cycle is just around the corner!

As always, just my opinion.

.

Comments Regarding Campaign Finances

Written by Roberta Biros

I’d like to think that my campaign for the office of Mercer County Treasurer has been significantly different than most. From the beginning, I’ve considered myself to be a political outsider. I’m not running for office as a ‘politician’. Instead, I’ve made it clear that I am simply a concerned citizen that is committed to serving the people of Mercer County. After all, the Office of County Treasurer is a public service . . . not a career.

Unlike most political candidates, I have made a special effort to conduct my campaign without the use of outside funding. Thus far, I have not solicited or accepted any donations from individuals or from political groups in any denomination. Those political contributions that have been received have been returned to the contributors un-cashed and voided along with a letter of sincere thanks for their generous offers. I’ve done this because I’m committed to taking the full personal, professional, and financial responsibility for my campaign.

This week campaign finance reports will be filed by political candidates throughout the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. The data for candidates running for state-wide office will be published on-line [CLICK HERE to go to the Commonwealth of PA website]. The data for candidates running for county-wide and municipal offices in Mercer County (and others) will be available from the County Elections Bureaus. Some will be reported in the press and other media, and some will be ignored. If the information regarding candidates of interest is not made available to you, I encourage you to visit the Elections Bureau and ask to see the details. It is important for educated voters to realize the expense that is involved in running for public office, and it is equally important to be knowledgeable of how those expenses are financed.

.

Chili Cook-Off: Hot, Hot, Hot!

Written by Roberta Biros

Mmmmmm . . . Chili! What says "Fall" more than a bowl full of hot (temperature) and hot (spicy) chili?

My husband and I enjoy spicy food. Tobasco is a standard condiment on our dinner table, and we purchase Frank's Red Hot in the institutional gallon size jug. It should not, therefore, be a shock that I can whip up a pot of pretty hot chili. I've always thought that my chili was tasty and "heart-warming" (or some would say "heart-burning"), but I've never really tried my secret family recipe on anyone else. This weekend was a first. I entered the Chili Cook Off that was organized as a fundraiser for the Sharpsville VFD.

I love to cook, and I've watched endless cook off shows on the Food Network, but I've never considered entering one myself. Sure, I can throw together a pot of chili with my eyes closed, but how easy would it be to make a batch of chili to feed a LARGE crowd? I used a little common sense and was able to quintuple the basic ingredients from my standard recipe, but adding the "heat" was a little more complicated. We started cooking at 5:30am, and I fine tuned the seasoning for the next 4 hours. I crossed my fingers and hoped for the best.

The Cook Off was held at Sharpsville High School and it was a great opportunity to get together with the folks from the community for a common goal . . . raising money for the Sharpsville VFW. The organizers put together a wonderful event that included the Chili Cook Off, Bake Sale, and Chinese Auction. In the end, they managed to raise $1,200 for a great cause. It was a fun day from start to finish, and I was honored and humbled in the end to take home the first place ribbon.

The Herald was on hand to document the event with a full write up [READ HERE] and photo (displayed below).

I'd like to thank the volunteers and organizers for all of their hard work in putting together a wonderful event. I'd also like to send out a "high five" and "fist bump" to John Wolfe, the 1st place winner in the kid's division, as well as all of the other contestants with which I spend a fun-filled Saturday.

Would I do it again? ABSOLUTELY. It was a blast!


.

The State Budget: Who Should Be On The Chopping Block?

Written by Robera Biros

Lynn Saternow of the Sharon Herald is something else. Back in the spring Lynn made the precious statement “Who in their right mind would vote for Roberta Biros for county treasurer”. It was an entertaining editorial considering the Herald claims that they are unbiased in their comments. I have a sense of humor and made the best of the comments. I’ve even joked with Lynn personally about it. No hard feelings, right? I figured that Lynn just had a momentary lapse of judgment.

Last weekend I had the realization that Lynn didn’t just have a lapse of judgment several months ago . . . no, I think that Lynn may just be plain stupid (sorry Lynn).

On Saturday, Lynn had an editorial titled “Palin’s book sparks satire and a stab at state politicos” (READ HERE). In it he suggested that Mercer County voters should “fire” State Senator Bob Robbins, State Representative Dick Stevenson, State Representative Michele Brooks, and State Representative Mark Longietti due to the inability of the General Assembly to pass a State Budget. Lynn was so busy bloviating that he completely lost track of the facts. Painting with such a broad brush is just wrong, so I’d like to fill in the details for all of you . . . my loyal readers.

First, if he’d do his homework, Lynn would know that there is a hierarchy of blame for our lack of a budget. The finger pointing should start at the top and work its way down. Governor Rendell is at the top of the pyramid, the Republican leadership in the Senate comes up second, and the Democrat leadership in the House pulls up the rear. Are SOME of the names that Lynn mentioned worthy of blame? Sure. Should all of our legislators be fired? . . . that is simply ridiculous. Allow me to explain how each of our legislators is involved in the budget process.

Senator Bob Robbins

Senator Robbins is the Senate Republican Caucus Secretary. In the hierarchy of the Senate majority, he is #7. He is a supposed to be a high-ranking official. Is he ineffective? Yes. Has he been in too long? Yes. He keeps a low profile in hopes of squeaking through another re-election in 2010 after nearly being kicked to the curb in 2006 after his involvement in the “pay raise” fiasco. Senator Robbin’s days are numbered, and his inability to step up as a leader in Harrisburg is proof of that.

Senator Robbins HAS power, but he hasn’t used it to LEAD during the budget crisis. Does he deserve to be ‘fired’ because of his lack of action in the budget negotiations? I think so, but that is just my personal opinion.

Representative Dick Stevenson

While Rep. Stevenson is simply a member of the rank and file in the House of Representatives, he has a direct relationship with the budget fiasco in that he is on the Appropriations Committee. The Appropriations Committee controlled the budget since May of this year, and they can easily be blamed for our lack of a budget now. Rep. Stevenson’s power in the committee is limited as the Republican Party is in the minority in the House and it should be noted that he is not part of the leadership in the committee. He has had a front row seat to the excitement (or lack thereof) in the budget battle, but he is not necessarily to blame.

Does he deserve to be ‘fired’ because of his lack of action in the budget negotiations? Although he has a front row seat, I don’t think Rep. Stevenson holds blame in this situation. He may be a bit ineffective, but he doesn’t deserve to be fired because of it.

Representatives Mark Longietti and Michele Brooks

Reps. Longietti and Brooks are simply members of the rank and file in the state legislature. They have been waiting all summer for a budget to vote on, and they have been as disappointed as we are. They are both young, focused, and driven to appropriately represent their constituents. They will both become more effective as they work their way up in the ranks.

Do they deserve to be ‘fired” because of their lack of action in the budget negotiations? Not by a long shot. While Lynn shows an obvious lack of originality by throwing a shot at Michele Brooks, he demonstrates some level of insanity by taking on Mark Longietti. Lynn is not the first person to criticize the “love/hate” relationship that some have with Rep. Brooks; but Rep. Longietti has no problem with the “love/love” relationships that he has with his constituents. To openly state that Rep. Longietti needs to be fired falls under the category of “fightin’ words”. I can only compare it to spray-painting the words “egg my house” on your garage door a few days before Halloween.

Perhaps Lynn’s only purpose in writing his weekly columns is to annoy the readers in the valley. He demonstrated that this spring, and he is reinforcing his commitment with his latest rant. If that is the case . . . keep up the good work. You are doing a fine job, Lynn.

In Closing . . .

According to the press (and press releases from ‘some’ legislators), the budget process may be moving forward.

EXAMPLE ONE: On October 6, Senator Bob Robbins posted a press release to his website (although he did not send out an email message to his constituents) stating “Senate Sends Responsible Budget Package to House” [READ HERE].

EXAMPLE TWO: Similarly, Rep. Mark Longietti published a press release on his website (again no email) stating that he had “voted to approve the budget” [READ HERE and HERE].

EXAMPLE THREE: Today, The Herald printed a small story titled Pa. Lawmakers Could Get Budget Today. It was a short story, but the title summarized the content and the view from the Governor's Office.

OTHER EXAMPLES?: Unfortunately, Representatives Michele Brooks and Dick Stevenson have made not official announcements by email or through their websites regarding the current status of the budget battle.

While the legislator announcements and newspaper “snippets” are useful, I’d prefer to do a little research on my own. A quick review of PennsylvaniaVotes.org shows that a budget DID pass the Pennsylvania House of Representatives on Wednesday, October 7th, but it passed strictly along a party-line vote . . . again. There may be a budget moving along, but it is not one that looks potentially non-partisan. CLICK HERE to see the details of the October 7th budget vote. I have a bad feeling . . . and I truthfully HOPE THAT I’M WRONG . . . but I predict that they can paint a shiny smiley face on this, but the budget problems in Harrisburg may be far from over.

As always, just my opinion.

.

State Rep. Mark Longietti votes to approve 2009-10 state budget

LEGISLATOR ANNOUNCMENT from the office of STATE REPRESENTATIVE MARK LONGIETTI

HARRISBURG, Oct. 7 – State Rep. Mark Longietti released the following statement on the $27.8 billion General Fund budget the House of Representatives passed tonight:

"The budget is long overdue, but it reflects wise use of taxpayer money during this nationwide recession. It would spend less than last year, but would continue to make important investments, including many that I hope will benefit Mercer County.

"One of those areas is basic education funding, where House Democrats kept a pledge to add $300 million – important not only for students, but also for keeping property taxes in check. As part of this budget, an important education program, Science, It's Elementary, would be kept whole. This budget would also keep whole funding for important early childhood programs, including Head Start and Pre-K Counts.

"Hospitals, like Sharon Regional Health System and UPMC Horizon, would receive more than $300 million in supplemental payments in state and federal funds instead of taking very significant cuts under this budget. We also preserved important funding for job training and economic development programs that were facing steep cuts.

"Child Care Assistance, which helps fund day care centers, was funded at 90 percent of last year's level and we were able to add a small amount to Mental Health Services. Although it's a 0.2 percent increase, every little bit helps.

"Some areas, unfortunately, would be cut. Weed and Seed, which funds Sharon/Farrell Weed and Seed, would take a 63 percent cut. But we were able to keep some funding instead of eliminating it as was proposed.

"Another program that suffered is Mercer Community Education Council. I hope it's able to reopen based on the fact we secured $2 million for Community Education Councils.

"Meanwhile, House Democrats worked hard and succeeded in removing the taxes on small games of chance. That tax was unfair to nonprofit community organizations that provide scholarships and help meet community needs.

"Now I hope the Senate will join us in passing this budget so it can go to the governor's desk quickly."

.

Rep. Mark Longietti Reminds Residents that LIHEAP to take applications beginning Nov. 2

LEGISLATOR ANNOUNCEMENT FROM THE OFFICE OF REPRESENTATIVE MARK LONGIETTI

I'm writing to let you know that Pennsylvania's Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Program will open about a month earlier than expected because of a recent increase in federal funding.

The Department of Public Welfare considered opening LIHEAP on Dec. 1 due to funding concerns, but a recent increase in federal funding will allow it to open Nov. 2.

The program provides cash and crisis assistance grants to help families heat their homes. In these tough economic times, I'm sure there are families in our community that can benefit. A family of four with an annual income of up to $33,075 can qualify for assistance.

Once the program opens, applications will be available at the Mercer County Assistance Office, local utility companies and community service agencies. The toll-free number for the county assistance office is 1-800-747-8405.

Starting Nov. 2, the application will also be available on the state Department of Public Welfare's Web site.

As always, if I can be of assistance, contact me.

.

A Dog's Prayer

This was forwarded by a friend and I just couldn't resist sharing. The intensity of the dog's face shows more sincerity than most people!



PHOTO CAPTION:

'Dear Lord: Thank you for bringing me to Timmy ' s house, and not to
Michael Vick’s -- AMEN! '

.

If You Aren't Concerned . . . You Should Be!

If you don't believe that we are bankrupting our children and our children's children, watch this video . . . then stop and do the math. It is troubling.

If you can't view the video above, CLICK HERE to go directly to YouTube.

In Memory of Adorable Deborah

Written by Roberta Biros

This time of year is very difficult for me. It marks the anniversary of a very sad time for my family. As a bit of therapy, I’d like to share my feelings with all of you . . . my loyal readers.

In September of 2003, my sister, Debbie, entered the hospital with severe complications from her 15-year struggle with Multiple Sclerosis. She was diagnosed with a fungus on her heart and began a difficult treatment of heavy antibiotics to fight the infection.

Despite the treatment efforts, my sister’s condition became much worse and she suffered a severe heart attack. Her chances of a successful recovery were lost and the prognosis was not good. My sister’s husband and our family held a hearing with hospital representatives to determine the fate of my sister. The discussions were difficult, but we all agreed to allow my sister to be taken off of life support and be taken home to pass away in hospice care. We determined that it was what she would have wanted. The hospital heard our plea and granted my sister the “right to die”. My sister was taken to her home by ambulance, and she was kept comfortable during her final days.

On October 22, 2003, at the age of 48, my sister passed away at home . . . privately . . . peacefully . . . with her husband at her side.

On that night, ‘an angel got her wings’.

In Loving Memory of Adorable Deborah
July 9, 1955 - October 22, 2003

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

Every year I cannot help but to reflect back on the events of October 2003.

Just recently (in Mercer County Democrat Committee Chairman Robert Lark’s ‘Labor Day Message to the People of Mercer County’) I was reminded of the parallels between my family’s experiences and the highly politicized fight between the Schaivo’s and Schindlers regarding Terri Schaivo’s “right to die” (also in October of 2003).

Terri Schaivo’s husband, Michael, was involved in a well publicized legal battle with the Schindler’s, Terri Schaivo’s parents, regarding whether Terri should be removed from life support or not. In October of 2003, the Florida Legislature and Florida Governor Jeb Bush became personally involved in the case. They took the rights away from the husband and family and attempted to put the control of the situation into the hands of the government.

On October 15, 2003, Terri Schiavo's feeding tube was removed. Within a week, when the Schindlers' final appeal was exhausted, the Florida Legislature passed "Terri's Law," which gave Governor Bush the authority to intervene in the case. Bush immediately ordered the feeding tube reinserted against the wishes of Terri’s husband.

To this day my family is thankful that the government DID NOT take it upon themselves to step into our very private and very personal matter. We are thankful that we were not involved in an ugly legal and political battle like the Schiavos and Schindlers. Our decisions and experiences were difficult enough without the interference of politicians trying to make a name for themselves. There are some things that should never attempt to be “legislated”. There are circumstances and situations in life that need to remain private and personal, and government interference is simply wrong and should not be allowed or tolerated.

These are my personal thoughts and opinions, and they have remained (for the most part) private until today.

.

Political Strategy: How They Plan To Take Me Down

Written by Roberta Biros

Politics and politicians are funny, but they are far more entertaining when you can watch from a distance. While my current campaign prevents me from ‘enjoying’ the fun, my seat in the front row lets me see every detail . . . “dirty blow by dirty blow”.

From the beginning, my campaign for the office of Mercer County Treasurer was intended to be a clean and civil debate putting the concepts of good, smart, and efficient government and public service up against the single-mindedness of career politicians. It is my desire to serve the people of Mercer County because I feel that I can bring cost-saving and intelligent ideas to an office that has remained unchanged and unchallenged for far too long. I’ve vowed to wear only ‘one hat’ . . . the hat of a public servant. I’ve promised that I would have only ‘one boss’ . . . the taxpayers of Mercer County. I’ve pledged to perform one very specific and much-needed task . . . update and upgrade the Treasurer’s Office to better serve the people of the county by cutting costs, and saving taxpayers’ time and money.

As a ‘non-politician’, I’ve been beaten and battered from the very start of my campaign. I’ve taken heat from both sides of the fence, and I’ve been publicly attacked (both verbally and in writing). I ceased campaign activities once because people ‘from my side’ attacked my opponent personally. I wouldn’t be part of it and I ceased campaign activities in an effort to stop the dirtiness. I got back into the race because concerned citizens wanted a choice . . . they wanted a fresh voice . . . they wanted ‘change that works’.

I got back into the race by jumping in with both feet in early June. I had a long conversation with the Chairman of the Democrat Committee, and I promised him my commitment to my campaign as well as the campaigns of all of Democrat candidates with which I am running. My husband and I have worked hundreds of hours in the Democrat booth at fairs and events across the county. We’ve promoted ourselves and the party at every turn. We have been energetic and friendly and we have done our best to be exemplary representatives of the Democrat Party.

After a very long summer, what is our reward? Are we embraced by the party and brought into the fold as cherished members of the team? Not exactly. While we’ve proven our honorable intentions to many, and we have earned the respect and friendship of hundreds, we still have issues with some folks within our own Party. A few of my fellow Democrats have even gone so far as to actively campaign against me. Unfortunately, they are so blatant and so bold in their actions that they actively bad mouth me to my very own friends. In doing so, they have been kind enough to reveal their exact plan for taking me down. Allow me to share the information with all of you so that we are all well aware of the scheme.

Democrat Strategy: Rumors

There are members of the Democrat Party that have begun their own plots against my candidacy. I’ve been observing them carefully, and I question their loyalties to the Party as I generally see them spending more time ‘under the Republican tent’ than with the Democrats, but I prefer to let actions speak for themselves. They have been working against me for months, but they, too, are becoming blatant and bold. The following statement was made to a loyal friend of mine on Saturday, September 12th. The statement was made by a Democrat from the Democrat Booth at the Jamestown Fair. While it is not a direct quote, it is an accurate summary of the statement that was made:

“There are 5,000 more Democrats in the county than Republicans. We need to suppress Democratic turnout so Mrs. Richardson can win. Republicans must get out the vote to keep Mrs. Richardson in office. We intend to spread a rumor that she [Roberta] will turn Republican once in office.”

Rumors . . . yes folks, they intend on taking me down by spreading ‘fabricated rumors’. I’d like to point out that normal people (like you and I) refer to that as ‘lies’, but I suppose I’m nitpicking.

Republican Strategy: Threats

The Republican Party has already begun their attacks on me, of course. They have confronted political friends (from both parties) who have had the nerve to be seen talking to me. They have pulled them aside and they have threatened that by associating with me they will be ruined politically.

Luckily, the folks who are my friends have told me about the threats. The folks who only appeared to be my friends have now distanced themselves from me personally, and that suits me just fine.

Additionally, members of the Republican Party are still referring back to newspaper reports from earlier this year when the Democrat Party Chairman attempted to extinguish me politically. They say things like “haven’t you read the stories about her”. They refuse to accept that much time has passed and many things have changed. Instead, they hope to push around the same dirt . . . over and over again.

These are all typical plays from the standard Republican Party Playbook. It is all an attempt to isolate me and my campaign, but I am not bothered by it. What do I intend to do about it? Nothing, as there is really nothing that I can do. I will simply continue to work hard and talk to voters (one person at time) in an effort to let people know that I am honest, transparent, and hardworking. I will leave it to people to make up their own minds.

What will I do to combat the ‘rumors’ and ‘threats’?

If I lose friends because they take heed to the ‘threats’ about being associated with me, then I haven’t lost ‘very good friends’. I figure that if ‘so called’ friends alienate me because of political threats, I was never really their friend anyway so it isn’t a loss. People that have really taken the time to get to know me wouldn’t be swayed by the political rants from either side. I will continue to let my actions speak for themselves.

As far as the ‘rumors’, all I can do is combat the rumors with the truth. By being transparent, I will give people the opportunity to see through the rumors to the actual facts (if they choose to do so).

Where does that leave me?

I am . . . and I will remain a Democrat . . . a fiscal conservative Democrat, but a Democrat none the less.

I am very comfortable with my political stand. I believe in fiscal responsibility and careful government spending, but I whole-heartedly support social and personal freedoms. I believe in smaller government and less government control, but I support government compassion for those that need help. My life experiences have made me who I am and have molded my personal and political beliefs. I will gladly discuss my stand with anyone that asks because I am transparent and truthful, and, most importantly, I am passionate about making a difference.

I am available for private questions anytime by email (Roberta.in.mercer@gmail.com) or by phone (724.475.3479). I welcome conversation from anyone that is willing to have a civil and constructive discussion. I will not, however, tolerate dirtiness, and I will not be part of an ugly argument . . . because that is just not who I am or what I am about.

.

The Truth About Health Care "Guarantees"

Written by Roberta Biros

Every morning I get my dose of national news by scanning local and cable news programs. We flip between Youngstown news programming, CNN, and Fox News in order to see a full spectrum of news and opinion. I witnessed a commercial that aired on Fox News this morning, and I felt it deserved some special attention. You may view the entire commercial below:

[or CLICK HERE to go directly to YouTube to view the video]

I ask that you also carefully read the text of the commercial as it is transcribed below:

"Despite what the President or Congress say, their health care proposals do not guarantee that you can keep your own doctor.

They don’t guarantee that you won’t wait longer for care.

There is no guarantee against health care rationing, and no guarantee you won’t lose your current insurance.

That’s because the President’s public option plan could lead to GOVERNMENT run health care.

Don’t be fooled. Tell President Obama to drop his government run public option plan."

NO GUARANTEES? Oooooooooooooo . . . that is pretty scary stuff, right?

Hold on . . . not so fast!

I politely ask the people of CPRights.org (Conservatives for Patients Rights) who sponsored the commercial, “Where are our GUARANTEES now?”

As one of the MILLIONS of Americans that is currently uninsured, I have no guarantee that I will keep my current doctor. As a “cash only” patient, I have no guarantee that I won’t have to wait for health care if I need it. I’ll openly admit that I’m NOT afraid of losing my current insurance (as I don’t have any), but I AM afraid of losing my home should I be hit with a major medical catastrophe that requires an extended hospital stay or complicated or expensive medical treatments or procedures.

I have made it no secret that I am a fiscal conservative. I believe in careful and responsible spending in my home, in my business, and at all levels of government. As a fiscal conservative, I also support health care reform as it is the only responsible way to address one of the biggest socioeconomic issues of our time.

As a small business owner, I have been unable to afford the luxury of health care coverage for well over two years. Without an affordable option available, I’m left to pay my health care expenses out of my pocket as a “cash customer”. While it was a risky decision, I was left with no other choices as there are no ‘affordable’ options available for people with pre-existing conditions. The cost for simple “husband and wife” coverage (with only 80/20 coverage and a high deductible) had a price tag of nearly $1000 per month, which is not “affordable”. I provide these details because it is important for the naysayers to understand that this problem is far reaching and serious. These specifics explain my situation, but I am not alone in the problems and decisions that I face.

I agree that people should have continued access to ‘private health care insurance’ if they can get it and if they can afford it, but I also believe that health care reform without the inclusion of a ‘public option’ is useless. If people do not have health care coverage and are unable to purchase affordable insurance through a private plan, they should have the ability to purchase coverage through the government and the fee should be based on their income. People in very low income brackets would receive coverage for little or no cost, but small business owners could purchase coverage for fees as high as several hundred dollars a month per person (based on their ability to pay).

I’m not sure that the Conservatives for Patients Rights realize that the arguments used in the commercial above can be used to explain exactly why health care reform IS needed. The American people deserve a GUARANTEE . . . a guarantee that some form of affordable health care coverage is available if they need it or want it. We don’t have that guarantee now, and we will never have it without serious and responsible health care reform.

I don't claim to have the answers, but I do know that scare tactics (like the ones used in the commercial above) threaten to stifle the conversation and stop the possibility of reform.

As always, just my opinion.

Rep. Michele Brooks and Others Comment on Reports of Budget Compromise

LEGISLATOR ANNOUNCEMENT / RADIO FEED

The state budget compromise appears to be moving forward in Harrisburg, but not all legislators are on board with the direction the new spending plan is taking. Rep. Michele Brooks (R-Mercer & Crawford) said she is glad to see some progress on the budget by has concerns about how this proposal may affect Pennsylvania’s economy. Mike Davies Reports

CLICK HERE to download and hear the Audio Clip

CLICK HERE to view the Video Clip on YouTube

Click on the Video Clips below to hear what other conservative legislators have to say about the issue. There are statements posted by Representative Turzai, Representative Reichley, and Representative Rapp.

COMMENTS FROM REPRESENTATIVE TURZAI



[or CLICK HERE to view the video from Rep. Turzai]

COMMENTS FROM REPRESENTATIVE REICHLEY:



[or CLICK HERE to view the video from Rep. Reichley]

COMMENTS FROM REPRESENTATIVE RAPP:


[or CLICK HERE to view the video from Rep. Rapp]

How Smart is Your Right Foot?

This was too funny and I just had to share. I entertained myself for quite a while with it. Give it a try and see for yourself.

HOW SMART IS YOUR RIGHT FOOT?

1. While sitting at your in front of your computer, lift your right foot off the floor and make clockwise circles.

2. Now, while doing this, draw the number '6' in the air with your RIGHT HAND.

Your foot will change direction.

I told you so!!! And there's nothing you can do about it! You and I both know how foolish this seems, but before the day is done you are going to try it again, if you've not already done so.
Send it to your friends to frustrate them, too; as I just did.

What a Week!

Written by Roberta Biros

You’ve all had a ‘bad day’, right? Have you ever had seven of them in a row? If you have, you have some understanding of the way that last week went for me.

We started the week by closing up our activities at the Stoneboro Fair on Labor Day (September 7th). I spent about seven hours at the Stoneboro Fair booth after a difficult political battle forced me out of the Buhl Day celebration in Hermitage. It all worked out, but it made for a long and stressful day. On Tuesday, September 8th, we did a quick turn around for the setup at the Jamestown Fair. Our reception at Jamestown was exactly what we had expected . . . friendly. It was a great experience (as always), but it was exhausting.

As the political season is moving on, we are finding more unexpected ‘battles’ and ‘dirtiness’ than I would like. I had hoped to push through to Election Day by maintaining a level civility with all sides, but ‘all sides’ don’t seem to agree. My week was spent putting out ‘little fires’, and it made a long week even longer.

Even with all of the ‘bad’, I still found it possible to focus on the ‘good’ . . . a much awaited visit with my Mom. While I talk with my Mom by phone several times each week, my hectic schedule has prevented me from visiting her in Murrysville. I haven’t seen her since mid-July, and I was anxious for her to come up to Mercer to visit us for the weekend. I went to Murrysville to pick her up on Friday morning, and we were happy to have her stay with us through Sunday afternoon. While she was here she was able to enjoy a brief tour of the Mercer County Courthouse, an evening at the Jamestown Fair, and she was able to be a part of the Jamestown Fair Parade on Saturday afternoon. I was, however, especially looking forward to Sunday.


After a long and difficult week, I was looking forward to the Children’s Miracle Network fundraiser that was to be held in Greenville on Sunday. It was intended to be a great day with folks from the community, and it was an opportunity to raise money for a worthy cause. I had booked the ‘young and talented’ Connor VanSickle to entertain the crowd during the event, and I couldn’t wait for my Mom to hear him perform. Connor is a 16-year old ‘man’ who is an incredible entertainer. He is well known for his Jerry Lee Lewis style 50’s rock and roll, but I appreciate his 50’s and 60’s style country music. I knew that my Mother would adore him (and I was not disappointed). By the second song of the show, Connor’s performance had my Mom in tears. She was stunned by his talent and brought to tears by the soulful way with which he performed some of her favorite songs. The experience managed to erase all of the problems of the week.


In closing I’d like to offer an analogy . . .

“Even a melted and messy ice cream sundae is delicious when it is topped with whipped cream and a cherry.”

Spending the weekend with my Mom, and seeing her so happy made even the worst week palatable. It was the whipped cream and cherry on my sundae (or should I say ‘Sunday’).

Representative Michele Brooks Supports Rarely Used Maneuver to End Budget Impasse

LEGISLATOR ANNOUNCEMENT

To help end the budget impasse, Rep. Michele Brooks (R-Crawford/Mercer/Lawrence) is joining with her colleagues in proposing a rarely used legislative procedure that would convene a special session of the House of Representatives that would meet every day until a budget is passed.

“Due to the inability of the joint House-Senate conference committee to reach a budget agreement, we need to look at all the options that exist in an effort to move a spending plan forward,” Brooks said. “I am disappointed that the budget impasse remains a deadlocked conversation over whether to limit government spending or raise taxes. I share the frustration faced by my constituents and Pennsylvania residents and understand that we need to reach a fiscally responsible budget.”

Brooks pointed out that the governor vetoed the funding, even though in some cases it matched the exact dollar amount he requested. In other cases, the line item may not have matched what he wanted but it would have provided temporary funding until a final budget would be negotiated and adopted.

The procedure unveiled Thursday, called the Committee of the Whole, allows members of the House to convene and openly discuss a particular topic in an effort to come to a compromise. In this case, members would debate a general appropriations act for 2009-10. If a majority of members agree to any particular proposal, it would then be recommended the House consider it in legislative session, where it could be voted.

“The Committee of the Whole approach is another way my colleagues and I are trying to break this impasse,” Brooks explained. “It is past time to put the great people of Pennsylvania before partisan politics. It is time to bring every budget proposal to the House floor for a vote and to give every member a voice in providing a balanced and fiscally responsible budget that reflects the challenging times we are in.”



CLICK HERE TO VIEW THE VIDEO

Brooks said the budget proposals she and her colleagues have put forth respond to all the people who have said for years that government needs to live within its means.

“We understand that the money in these budgets is your money, paid by the hard-working people of Pennsylvania. You demand that your government make the same difficult choices that your families have to make when there are shortfalls in your budgets,” she said. “Overwhelmingly, across this state, people have said they cannot afford to send more of their money to Harrisburg. It is with this in mind that we are working to strike a bipartisan and balanced approach to Pennsylvania’s budget. We have proposed funding core government services but curtailing state spending.

“It is unfortunate that those who seek to do business as usual and spend beyond their means are the very ones who have created this crisis for so many. They continue to believe the only way government can operate is to ask taxpayers for more of their hard-earned money instead of government tightening its belt, prioritizing spending, becoming more efficient and eliminating welfare fraud and abuse,” Brooks said.

She further explained that the people who cling to overspending and over borrowing continue to underestimate Pennsylvanians and fail to realize the devastating impact a type of tax increase would have on families, jobs and communities.

“Let us be clear. We do care about our children, and this is why we will not mortgage their future by placing more and more debt upon them,” she said. “I am hopeful this new approach will help show that the rank-and-file members are serious about getting a budget done.”

The procedure is being introduced in the House as a temporary rule by Rep. Craig Dally (R-Northampton) and was announced at a Capitol press conference in Harrisburg Thursday afternoon.

Rep. Michele Brooks

17th District

Pennsylvania House of Representatives

(724) 588-8911
(800) 457-2040
(814) 337-8132

(717) 783-5008

Member Site: RepMicheleBrooks.com
Caucus Site: PAHouseGOP.com

.